info@ejadtech.sa
966555861076
+

Test Summary Results

Document Change Control

Version No Date ModifiedIssued ByVersion CommentClickUp Version Time
1.012/4/2025Moataz (Moataz Mustafa)Second version of Test Summary Results (Sprints 1–8)

 

List Of Approvers

Name TitleApproved Release No
Tarek Ramadan Software Engineering Director 1.0

Project / Release Information

Release NameQC EngineerRelease Version #
 Enterprise Architecture (EA) Moataz (Moataz Mustafa)

 

Team

  • QA: Moataz
  • Developers: Ahmed Youssef, Eslam Rezk
  • Product Owner: Mohsen Wahed
  • Team Lead: Mahmoud Elbadry

 

1. Introduction

 

1.1 Purpose

This Test Summary Report for Enterprise Architecture (EA) covers test execution results for the newly delivered features and enhancements across Sprints 1–8, highlights key issues, risks, and recommendations, and provides stakeholders with a clear conclusion on overall quality and readiness in the Test environment.

 

1.2 Scope

 

This document summarizes results for the following scope delivered across four sprints:

 

  • Sprint 1 (11/27–12/11) – Beneficiary Experience (UX)
    • Create a New Main Structure – Beneficiary Experience (البنية تجربة المستفيد)
    • Personal Menu Definition – Persona (الشخصية)
    • Definition of Beneficiary (المستفيد)
    • Definition of Sub-stage (المرحلة الفرعية)
    • Definition Menu Step (الخطوة)
    • Definition of User Journey (رحلة المستفيد)

 

  • Sprint 2 (12/17–12/30) – Cybersecurity + UX Governance
    • Create a New Main Structure – Cybersecurity Structure (بنية الأمن السيبراني)
    • Security Apparatus List Definition (جهاز الأمن)
    • Definition of a Security Software list (برمجية الأمن)
    • Security Service Menu Definition (خدمة الأمن)
    • Cybersecurity Architecture Relationships (العلاقات)
    • Beneficiary Experience Governance and Control (حوكمة وتجربة المستفيد)
  • Sprint 3 (1/4–1/17) – General Model + EA Enhancements
    • Governance and monitoring of digital transformation goals.
    • Enhancements in EA Model.
    • Business capabilities and linkage to the organization.
    • UI updates and enhancements.

 

  • Sprint 4 (1/18–2/1) – Finalization and Quality Improvements
    • Final testing and bug fixing.
    • UI/UX updates as per feedback.
    • Defining component relationships for EA structures.
    • Full regression cycle and UAT support.

 

  • Sprint 5 (2/5–2/19) – Process Management & EA Logic
  • Creation of Process Engine (محرك العمليات).
  • Definition of Process Stages and Transitions.
  • Integration of Process Engine with EA Business Layer.
  • Visual Workflow Designer (BPMN Support).

 

  • Sprint 6 (2/23–3/9) – Advanced Analytics & Reporting
  • Development of EA Analytics Dashboard.
  • Heatmaps and Gap Analysis functionality.
  • Reporting Engine (Export to PDF/Excel).
  • Relationship and Impact Analysis for EA components.

 

  • Sprint 7 (3/13–3/27) – Compliance & System Hardening
  • Compliance Management Module.
  • Security Hardening and Audit Trail implementation.
  • Final Bug Fixing and Performance Tuning.
  • Final UAT Support, Documentation, and Knowledge Transfer.

Sprint 8 (3/18–4/31) – UI/UX Finalizations & Performance Testing

  • Dynamic List View Relations (إدارة أعمدة القائمة الديناميكية).
  • Business Services form modifications (SLA, Automation Level) and Many-to-Many relation updates.
  • End-to-End integration validation across all EA architectural layers.

 

Test types executed

  • Functional Testing – validate new and enhanced features vs AC.
  • UI Testing – verify screens/grids (Arabic RTL, labels, list/form consistency).
  • Integration Testing (UI-level) – verify relationships between structures and reflection in metamodel/diagrams.
  • Smoke Testing – quick pass after each deployment.
  • Sanity Testing – quick check around delivered fixes and main flows.
  • Regression Testing – targeted regression on impacted modules/menus/relations.
  • Usability Testing (basic) – readability, alignment, validation message clarity.
  • UAT Support – business validation with PO during demo/acceptance.

Not executed

  • API testing, automation testing, performance, security testing.

Test levels

  • System Testing – end-to-end flows across EA structures and menus on Test env.
  • Integration Testing – interaction between UX components/menus + cybersecurity relationships + metamodel diagrams (via UI).
  • Acceptance Testing – PO sign-off per story during UAT/demo.

Environments & Tooling

  • Environment: Test only (no Stage)
  • Browsers: Chrome (Primary), Edge (sanity)
  • Tools: ClickUp (stories, defects, execution), screenshots/video evidence
  • Evidence: screenshots (Arabic UI), data dictionaries (when provided), story AC

 

2. Test Results Summary

SprintTest Cases PlannedExecutedPassedFailedBlockedObsolete
Sprint 1135135135000
Sprint 2175175175000
Sprint 3163163163000
Sprint 4106106106000
Sprint 5606056400
Sprint 6197197189800
Sprint 71401401291100
Sprint 8404040000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total101610169932300

test set link to click up:

 

 

2.2 Final Test Results Summary

Test Metrics

Test Effort Summary

  • Test effort (in each test sprint) need to add auto calculation in dashboard
  • Test effort (total across 8 sprints) = 479 estimated hours (46925actual)
  • Variance = -9.75hr
  • No. of Executed TCs = 1016, deferred TCs = 0
  • TC's Passed = 993, Failed =23, Not executed =0

 

3. Defect Summary & Quality Indicators

3.1 DRE (Defect Removal Efficiency)

 

SprintTester bugs (Pre-Release)PO bugs (Post-Release/UAT)defects transferred from previous sprintsReopen defectsDRE %Notes
Sprint 14003100%

 

Sprint 214010100%

 

Sprint 39020100%

 

Sprint 413041100%

 

Sprint 55011100%

 

Sprint 615003100%

 

Sprint 715032100%

 

Sprint 82000

 

 

Overall7701110100%

 

for DRE in dashboard:https://app.clickup.com/4669532/dashboards/4eg2w-60295 

SeverityCount
Critical0
High47
Medium22
Low7

for DRE in dashboard:https://app.clickup.com/4669532/dashboards/4eg2w-60295 

 

4. Test Analysis (by Environment)

4.1 Environment Notes

  • Only Test environment was available (no Stage), which increases reliance on smoke + sanity after deployments.
  • Some flows depend on seeded master data (structures, components, relations), which can impact repeatability if data is changed/reset.

4.2 Constraints / Gaps Observed

  • No BRD/SRS for the EA project; requirements rely on ClickUp AC + screenshots + demo notes.
    • Corrective Action: Create a full documentation pack (BRD/SRS + data dictionary per module + role matrix). This reduces dependency on long handover meetings and supports onboarding new team members faster.
  • UI design gaps: some enhancements may lack final mockups (spacing/RTL polish, new tabs layout).
    • Corrective Action: attach a small Figma frame or annotated screenshot for each UI change (field placement, column order, tooltip/truncation rules).

5. Bugs / defects Log

this dashboard has all bugs found in release with its status and severity EA - البنية المؤسسية > EA - Testing > Bugs106

 

 

6. Recommendations (Lessons Learned)

  1. Environment Standardization
  2. Maintain a shared “golden configuration” (menus, ACLs, parameters) consistently applied to Test before execution.
  3. UI Spec First
  4. Provide quick Figma/annotated screenshot per UI change to reduce interpretation and rework.
  5. Reusable Data Sets Library
  6. Maintain reusable Arabic/English seed data (beneficiaries, personas, journeys, cybersecurity components, relations) to speed regression and reduce blockers.
  7. Regression Pack Definition (Manual)
  8. Build a stable “core regression checklist” for:
    • Main structures CRUD
    • Relationships creation + validations
    • Metamodel diagram reflection
    • Search/filter/list/form navigation

7. Conclusion

Testing across Sprints 1–8 for the Enterprise Architecture (EA) module indicates the delivered scope is functionally stable on Test environment, and core menus/structures/relationships flows are testable with documented evidence. All Critical/High defects (if any) must be closed or explicitly waived by PO before considering any go-live decision. Key improvement areas remain: formal documentation (BRD/SRS), UI mockups for changes, and standardized seed data & environment configuration.